Sally Kohn on Planned Parenthood Florida Testimony — Fox News
Standard
7 thoughts on “Sally Kohn on Planned Parenthood Florida Testimony — Fox News”
You tell, ‘em, Sally! The women’s rights movement has come so far in
America by coming up with safe, legal ways for women to “get rid of their
children.” I mean, what would career-minded women do if we didn’t have
convenient ways for them to “get rid of their children” available?! (I feel
compelled to leave a note clarifying that the above comment is intended
sarcastically given how far out there some people have gone supposedly in
the name of “women’s rights.”)
Murder is murder…a serial killer is put away for life, electrocuted or
put in the gas chamber an abortionist is paid and gets to go home. I can’t
believe these idiots believe anybody has a choice in whether or not the
baby should live.
You know what I love about “news”, especially on “Faux News” is that they
take one phrase out of context and balloon it into a massive conspiracy or
issue when there is none. They are fear stokers because their relatively
uninformed audience feed on it. Gives them their anit-Obama,
anti-government, anti-american stance substance. It is quite disgusting.
Nice job though Sally!
Out of context – right. So, by your standard, life and death are matters of
context. Interesting. I guess stopping at a red light is also a matter of
context (i.e., if I don’t SEE a car approaching or in the intersection, I
don’t need to stop). Does that work for you? And don’t go there with
“stopping at a red light is the law”. MURDER is against the law – and
that’s what abortion and killing a botched-abortion baby are. Oh, and your
cute reference to “Faux News” is old Dougie. Get a new gig.
Ms. Kohn, the reality of abortion is that it is the deliberate termination
of a human life. That fact alone outweighs all other considerations,
except for instances where the life of the mother is threatened by
childbirth. This is simply not debatable. There is a law much higher than
man’s law, (whether or not one recognizes it is irrelevant–it still
exists), and woe be unto man when he assumes that his law supercedes that
higher law.
With so many already-existing children suffering in the world, people think
that defending a pack of uteral tissue a worthy cause? Oh wait….shouldn’t
tumors, bacteria and viruses have their rights too?!
You tell, ‘em, Sally! The women’s rights movement has come so far in
America by coming up with safe, legal ways for women to “get rid of their
children.” I mean, what would career-minded women do if we didn’t have
convenient ways for them to “get rid of their children” available?! (I feel
compelled to leave a note clarifying that the above comment is intended
sarcastically given how far out there some people have gone supposedly in
the name of “women’s rights.”)
Murder is murder…a serial killer is put away for life, electrocuted or
put in the gas chamber an abortionist is paid and gets to go home. I can’t
believe these idiots believe anybody has a choice in whether or not the
baby should live.
You know what I love about “news”, especially on “Faux News” is that they
take one phrase out of context and balloon it into a massive conspiracy or
issue when there is none. They are fear stokers because their relatively
uninformed audience feed on it. Gives them their anit-Obama,
anti-government, anti-american stance substance. It is quite disgusting.
Nice job though Sally!
Out of context – right. So, by your standard, life and death are matters of
context. Interesting. I guess stopping at a red light is also a matter of
context (i.e., if I don’t SEE a car approaching or in the intersection, I
don’t need to stop). Does that work for you? And don’t go there with
“stopping at a red light is the law”. MURDER is against the law – and
that’s what abortion and killing a botched-abortion baby are. Oh, and your
cute reference to “Faux News” is old Dougie. Get a new gig.
anti-choice??? anti-death! Sally Kohn is an abortion loving dyke that
deserves to be dismembered in public.
Ms. Kohn, the reality of abortion is that it is the deliberate termination
of a human life. That fact alone outweighs all other considerations,
except for instances where the life of the mother is threatened by
childbirth. This is simply not debatable. There is a law much higher than
man’s law, (whether or not one recognizes it is irrelevant–it still
exists), and woe be unto man when he assumes that his law supercedes that
higher law.
With so many already-existing children suffering in the world, people think
that defending a pack of uteral tissue a worthy cause? Oh wait….shouldn’t
tumors, bacteria and viruses have their rights too?!